So is Donald Trump paying for all of his positive media coverage? Maybe.

Wait, they're on to me? How much will it cost to get them off the story?

Courtesy of Buzzfeed: 

According to four sources with knowledge of the situation, editors and writers at the outlet have privately complained since at least last year that the company’s top management was allowing Trump to turn Breitbart into his own fan website — using it to hype his political prospects and attack his enemies. One current editor called the water-carrying “despicable” and “embarrassing,” and said he was told by an executive last year that the company had a financial arrangement with Trump. A second Breitbart staffer said he had heard a similar description of the site’s relationship with the billionaire but didn’t know the details; and a third source at the company said he knew of several instances when managers had overruled editors at Trump’s behest. Additionally, a conservative communications operative who works closely with Breitbart described conversations in which “multiple writers and editors” said Trump was paying for the ability to shape coverage, and added that one staffer claimed to have seen documentation of the “pay for play.” 

All four sources spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to jeopardize their jobs; and none knew exactly how Trump’s alleged arrangement with the privately held company worked.

Well it makes sense if you think about it.

After all this is the guy who hired actors to increase the size of the crowd during his announcement speech.

Of course the management at Breitbart denies this is true, but then what else would you expect them to say?

However since this is four different sources coming forward that makes their denial a little weak.

My question is how many other "news" outlets are on the take?

Tweet